The Norman Transcript

Columns

May 26, 2014

Preventive Health Care for the Planet

NORMAN — As the U.S. experiments with providing greater health care coverage to the public, we need to acknowledge the looming but under-reported health care costs that result from the burning of fossils fuels. Here in Oklahoma, many citizens living near coal-fired power plants already pay the greatest personal costs of dirty energy in the forms of cancer, asthma, and other respiratory diseases, which yearly result in 23,600 premature deaths nationwide. Because natural gas is essentially free of air-borne particulates associated with coal and produces less CO2/BTU than burning oil, it is touted as a ‘clean’ energy source. However, gas, coal, and oil are all ‘dirty fuels’ because they dump CO2 into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change, which the international medical journal, The Lancet, recently identified as “the biggest global health threat of the 21st century”.

Harvard public health expert Epstein outlines the health risks associated with climate change in the book, Changing Climate, Changing Health (Epstein & Farber, 2011). Increasing temperatures expand the range of vector-borne insects, exposing us to greater risk of diseases like Dengue fever, West Nile Virus and malaria. Major floods, heat waves, and droughts are expected to increase in frequency, increasing the risks of water-borne diseases, crop failures, and malnutrition. The 2-week heat wave in California in 2006 caused 655 deaths, 1,620 hospitalizations, and over 16,000 excess emergency room visits, at a price tag of $5.4 billion dollars. Over a 7-year. period, from 2002-09, the estimated excess in health care costs due to climate change totaled nearly $15 billion (Health Affairs, Nov. 2011). The burden that climate change is imposing on an increasingly sick planet is a bitter pill for US taxpayers, whose per capita health expenditure is already the world’s highest.

Preventive care for the planet is the most efficient prescription to mitigate rising costs. Conservative economists Art Laffer, Glenn Hubbard, and George Schultz agree that a fee on carbon at its source would be the least expensive way for the US to reduce its deadly reliance on CO2-producing fossil fuels and transition to clean, sustainable energy. A market-driven solution will level the playing field and spur major innovations in clean energy and economic growth (http://www.realclearpolicy.com/video/2013/06/27/think_tanks_debate_carbon_tax.html). Oklahoma Congressmen Cole, Inhofe, and Coburn advocate for a smaller, more efficient government with fewer intrusive regulations. We agree, and urge them to join with other Republicans to support a revenue neutral bill to put a price on carbon. Placing a fair price on carbon that compensates for external costs associated with burning of fossil fuels, costs which are currently borne only by tax-payers, is only fair. If these ‘‘externalities’ were factored into the price of fuels, alternative energy sources, such as wind, geothermal and solar, whose external costs to public and environmental health are relatively low, would soon become more competitive than fossil fuels.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Columns
  • Congress should close gaps

    Of all of Edward Snowden’s revelations about electronic surveillance by the National Security Agency, the most unsettling was that the government was accumulating vast numbers of records about the telephone calls of American citizens. In ...

    July 27, 2014

  • Border obsession overlooks trade

    Texas Gov. Rick Perry made headlines recently by ordering 1,000 National Guard troops to the border. This bravado comes at a price: $12 million a month. Perry plans to send the bill the federal government. That’s one way to finance your ...

    July 27, 2014

  • Intercession badly needed in this world

    Yesterday was my feast day, or as the Italians call it, my “onomastico.” Since I live in the United States, it went completely unnoticed. If I lived in Italy, however, I would have been showered with cards and phone calls. That’s because ...

    July 27, 2014

  • Porch leap looked muchbigger as a kid

    It’s no secret that porch designs have changed over the years. Drive through new Norman developments and look at the porches. Most only have room for a potted plant and a spot to drop those UPS packages, no place for a porch swing or ...

    July 27, 2014

  • Keeping the war buried

    International outrage over the downing of a Malaysian passenger plane over Ukraine on July 17 does not appear to have affected either the actions of pro-Russia forces in that country or the material support Russia is offering the rebels. ...

    July 26, 2014

  • Gaza’s victims: civilians and peace

    After more than two weeks of fighting between Hamas and Israel, there is no question which side has the upper hand. Thursday’s strike on a U.N.-run school for Palestinian children increased the Palestinian death toll to more than 760. By ...

    July 26, 2014

  • Norman Forward builds momentum

    The quiet campaign to build momentum for a citywide public works project is beginning to attract some attention....

    July 20, 2014

  • Tax those trees out of here

    I read your editorial “Pesky red cedars” in the Norman Transcript of Tuesday, July 15, 2014. I have attended two meetings where the problem of the eastern red cedar trees was discussed. Because of the drought conditions in Oklahoma, we ...

    July 20, 2014

  • Make gun safety a health issue

    Quick, are you more likely to die by a bullet or in a car crash? Common sense would seem to suggest the latter. Cars are everywhere. We are an auto-obsessed nation. To be American is to drive — everywhere. Teenagers itch to get behind the ...

    July 20, 2014

  • They just want to be free ... maybe

    Massoud Barzani, president of Iraq’s semiautonomous Kurdistan region, rattled many cages this month when he announced in parliament that the KRG would be moving ahead soon on a referendum on independence from Iraq. If Kurdistan goes ahead ...

    July 20, 2014