The Norman Transcript

Editorials

May 13, 2013

U.S. must reform program

NORMAN — America sends about $1.4 billion a year in emergency food aid to needy people around the world through the Food for Peace Program. By law, practically all that aid is produced in the U.S. and shipped by U.S. companies to far-flung places. Some food donations get sold once they’re delivered overseas, to fund development projects.

That’s a terribly expensive and inefficient system. The high costs of growing and shipping food here mean fewer people get fed. Delivering huge amounts of U.S. grain and other farm products distorts the local markets where it is delivered. It forces prices down, discouraging local farmers from raising staple crops where the need for food is greatest. Selling U.S. commodities abroad also is an inefficient way to raise money for development projects. Getting the food across the ocean boosts its cost by one-third.

The food program is an agricultural subsidy in disguise. Requiring the purchase of U.S. goods, transported only on U.S. ships, creates profits for American farmers and the agribusiness giants that control shipping. But American taxpayers don’t get their money’s worth.

Food aid is supposed to help relieve suffering. This program desperately needs to change, but the farm lobby works furiously to protect its vested interests. Hunger is big business, and Food for Peace has been a profit center.

We’re pleased to see the Obama administration make a run at changing that. Congress is under pressure to pass a Farm Bill, the five-year legislation reauthorizing farm subsidy programs. The administration has proposed a modest reform that can save money and feed more people.

Under the plan, about 45 percent of the food aid in 2014 would be used to buy food produced in the countries where it’s consumed. The food could be bought locally in bulk, or individual recipients could receive vouchers or debit cards to purchase what they need. Food bought locally is typically cheaper to produce and it requires no transoceanic shipping. By this simple step, 2 million to 4 million people could be fed each year. The aid could be delivered as much as 14 weeks faster than it is now.

Most other wealthy nations already provide food aid in grant form and decouple it from commercial transactions. In-kind food aid is limited to acute local shortages, or situations where local food markets aren’t functioning.

In the Obama proposal, more than half of U.S. food aid still would be earmarked for the purchase and transport of U.S. commodities, and shippers would receive a government subsidy.

— Chicago Tribune

1
Text Only | Photo Reprints
Editorials
  • Repairs still needed

    Lawmakers once again kicked the can down the road on making needed repairs to the state Capitol. By a 62-34 vote, they turned down a Senate-approved plan to authorize up to $160 million in bonds to repair the nearly century-old building....

    April 24, 2014

  • Can’t have it both ways

    Local sheriff Joe Lester wasn’t among the state sheriffs and lawmakers protesting the removal of state prisoners from county jails this week. The sheriffs, some of whom have protested by having too many state prisoners in their ...

    April 24, 2014

  • Help for rural America

    A drive through rural parts of the Southwest can be depressing. For sale and for rent signs are prevalent. Businesses along main streets have closed. Unless they are close to a major interstate highway, many communities are in decline....

    April 23, 2014

  • Embarrassment to Oklahoma, again

    The standardized testing that was halted in local schools Monday is another embarrassment to the state. The same thing happened a year ago and Oklahoma gave them another chance....

    April 23, 2014

  • Time to move on; exit of Sebelius is right choice

    From the moment it became obvious that healthcare.gov wasn’t working, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius became damaged goods for the White House....

    April 23, 2014

  • Happy birthday to us

    We don’t expect any cake and that many candles might be dangerous but today is the unofficial 125th birthday of Norman....

    April 22, 2014

  • Dancing forward

    The official motto for Mike Fowler’s chairmanship of the Norman Chamber of Commerce is “Moving Norman Forward.” But after Thursday night’s annual banquet, the sub-theme should be, “Let’s Dance, Norman.” More than 500 chamber members and ...

    April 19, 2014

  • Local control or not?

    Oklahoma lawmakers are a fickle bunch when it comes to issues of local control. Sometimes they want it and other times they do not....

    April 19, 2014

  • There’s no need to fix system that’s working

    Lawmaker attempts to alter the way judges are selected are being challenged by the state’s lawyers. More than 1,800 signatures on a state bar association petition urging a “no” vote on Senate Joint Resolution 21 have been gathered in just ...

    April 18, 2014

  • On the side of openness

    Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin has been criticized for failing to release emails and other information sought by press outlets who believe it was covered under the state’s Open Records Act. Now, Fallin is coming down on the side of keeping the ...

    April 18, 2014