subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Fri, Nov 27 2009 

Resources

print this story   Print this story
  Post to del.icio.us

Published October 18, 2006 12:05 am - Several experts weighed in on the effects the proposed 53-acre Sutton Creek Addition could have on the adjacent Sutton Urban Wilderness Park to the Greenbelt Commission Monday.

Biologists, developers discuss Sutton Creek



By Carol Cole

Transcript Staff Writer

Several experts weighed in on the effects the proposed 53-acre Sutton Creek Addition could have on the adjacent Sutton Urban Wilderness Park to the Greenbelt Commission Monday.

The developers’ representative also presented their plan and said they’d work to mitigate any adverse effects of the development, which is south of Rock Creek Road, between the IOOF Cemetery and Sutton Urban Wilderness Park.

Greenbelt Commission members pressed ahead on Phase II of its study despite recent news that the property appears to have defaulted to a R-1 or single family residential zoning designation after it was found the property may not have had zoning assigned after it was annexed by the city in 1961.

“We feel like the Greenbelt Commission was given a directive by the city council and we will proceed with that until directed differently,” said Diane Fitzsimmons, commission chair.

The commission is focusing on four factors determined from public input. Those include: maintaining the quality of the visitors’ experience at SUWP, maintaining the quality of the habitat and wildlife population, the condition of the riparian zone and maintaining open space in the subject tract.

Commission member Zev Trachtenberg, chairing the subcommittee working on the issue, said the efforts are modeled on a scientific inquiry method.

“The relevant facts we think are much the same,” he said, of the commission’s considerations if the zoning was in question.

The developers’ attorney Harold Heiple said his clients did not want to harm Sutton Wilderness in developing the property. But he said development the property was within the owners’ rights and they would likely be withdrawing their application for a Planned Unit Development and modifying it for the single family residential zoning, which requires 6,000 square feet minimum per lot.

“(The developers) want to do anything to lessen its impact,” Heiple said, with the exception of not developing the tract. “That’s not an option for us.”

Heiple said its a misconception that pesticides and herbicides would run into the creek.

“The lake in Sutton Urban Wilderness is upstream,” he said.

Heiple said the property owners had conveyed offers for the city to consider buying the property, including one for acquisition of all property and another for the northeast 10 acres. He said there had been no formal response from the city except from certain councilmembers who indicated the price was too high.

“We’ve gone about as far as we can,” he said.



print this story    email this story   






autoconx
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide

Find a job! Find a Home! Find a car!

Premium Jobs

Director of Marketing
Mays Hospice Care Companies,
with offices in Texas and Oklahoma,
is seeking a dynamic person to lead
our
...>MORE

LPC/LCSW
For a Growing
Agency in Norman
Services in
Cleveland/McClain Cty Area.
Contractor or Employee ...>MORE

See all ads

Premium Homes

See all ads

Premium Extras

See all ads


 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index