The Norman Transcript

Homepage

February 13, 2014

Three persons unrelated law challenged during City Council Oversight Committee

NORMAN — A law meant to protect single-family neighborhoods is under fire and could be modified or eliminated. Opponents of the city’s “three persons unrelated” law said Norman’s social host laws provide most of the protection needed.

“We don’t want it (the three persons unrelated law) modified, we want it abolished,” said John Lungren, a real estate owner, broker, property manager and landlord who said it’s an ugly ordinance that may violate fair housing laws.

The City Council Oversight Committee looked at two city ordinances Wednesday that may need to be modified. The oversight committee is charged with reviewing already existing ordinances, committee chair Council Member Lynne Miller said.

Council members sitting on the committee don’t vote but gather information from city staff and others, then forward ordinances to city council if change is warranted.

Miller said this issue has been brought up a number of times, and multiple students in a residence continues to be an issue for many Norman neighborhoods. Traffic, noise and parking are primary concerns.

Council member Greg Jungman said Fair Housing laws are not violated by the city’s ordinance. He supports the ordinance as is and does not want it changed.

Currently, the ordinance prohibits occupancy in single-family dwelling to families and to “no more than three unrelated persons,” according to city staff notes.

The ordinance has been in place since 1954 and was designed to “help protect the quality and character of neighborhoods,” according to a report by Planning and Community Development Director Susan Connors.

Connors said the ordinance helps reduce traffic, noise and parking problems that occur when numerous unrelated persons reside in the same home.

It’s an issue other college towns — including Tuscaloosa, Ala., and Oxford, Miss. — also address in a similar manner.

A U.S. Supreme Court case upheld that this type of ordinance is legal, Connors said. The ordinance allows for foster children.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Headlines

Sports
Opinion

Features

Must Read

Big 12 Media Days
Video
Disabled Veterans Memorial Nearing Completion Last Mass Lynching in U.S. Remains Unsolved Home-sharing Programs Help Seniors Clinton: "AIDS-Free Generation Within Our Reach" Ex-NYC Mayor: US Should Allow Flights to Israel Judge Ponders Overturning Colo. Gay Marriage Ban Airlines Halt Travel to Israel Amid Violence NYPD Chief Calls for 'use of Force' Retraining VA Nominee McDonald Goes Before Congress Bush: Don't Worry, Sugarland Isn't Breaking Up US Official: Most Migrant Children to Be Removed Police Probing Brooklyn Bridge Flag Switch CDC Head Concerned About a Post-antibiotic Era Raw: First Lady Says `Drink Up' More Water Courts Conflicted Over Healthcare Law Holder Urges Bipartisanship on Immigration Raw: Truck, Train Crash Leads to Fireball US Airlines Cancel Israel Flights Obama Signs Workforce Training Law Crash Victims' Remains Reach Ukraine-held City
Business

Photos


Facebook